Beheading is NOT a part of Islam

Beheading is not a part of Islam?

U.S. journalist James Foley was brutally be-headed in a video broadcast to the world. This was taped by ISIS or Dayish or Islamic State or whatever you want to call them. US President Barack Obama said the beheading of Foley was "an act of violence that shocks the conscience of the entire world". The President slammed ISIS, saying the militants speak for no religion, and that no faith teaches others to massacre innocents as ISIS does. Oh really, Mr Obama? Have you read the Koran? He gave the statement before he went off to play golf. Perhaps it is his job to play golf while the world burns? Reminds me of Roman Emperor Nero who played the fiddle while Rome burned.

Is this the first beheading of a journalist? How can we forget the murder of Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journal reporter who was executed in Pakistan in 2002. Both were working for American news outlets. Both were captured by so-called Islamist "extremists" and had video recordings of their executions released. In 2007, the Turkish despot, Erdogan claimed "The Term ‘Moderate Islam’ Is Ugly And Offensive; There Is No Moderate Islam; Islam Is Islam.” So in essence, Foley and Pearl were murdered by regular Muslims much like Erdogan himself is.

In 2013, two men attacked a man believed to be a British soldier in the London neighborhood of Woolwich. A video broadcast by the U.K. network ITV purports to show one of the two attackers explaining himself to a camera immediately after the attack. Here's what he said: "We swear by Almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you....You people will never be safe." Eyewitnesses described the attack as a "beheading." Have you forgotten?

We should not really talk about Britain that much as it has already been overrun by Islam. Remember this joke from 2009?

A Royal Navy destroyer finds four Muslims in a row boat in the Channel, rowing towards England. The captain gets on the loud haler and shouts, "Ahoy, small craft, where are you heading?"
One of the Muslims stands up and shouts, "We are invading the UK!"
The crew of the destroyer keel over laughing. When the captain finally recovers, he gets back on the loud haler and says, "Just the four of you?"
The Muslim stands up again and shouts,
"No, we're the last four ... the rest are already there!" 

Or this one:

Registry on the first day back at school in Birmingham, ENGLAND The teacher began calling out the names of the pupils:-
"Mustafa Al Eih Zeri?" "Here"
"Achmed El Kabul?" "Here"
"Fatima Al Hayek? " "Here"
"Ali Abdul Olmi?" "Here"
"Mohammed Bin Kadir?" "Here"
"Ali Son al En” - silence in the classroom. "Ali Son al En" - continued silence as everyone looked around the room. The teacher repeated the call.
A girl stood up and said, "Sorry teacher. I think that's me. It's pronounced Alison Allen." 

Particularly relevant as kids have just gone back to school after a vacation.

It is little wonder that Eurabia and England keep attacking Israel seeing as how they are so ridden with the same extremist religion that they drove out over a thousand years ago. Do not say we did not warn you.

But dear Obama, beheading is exactly Mulslim culture and consistent with the sacred teachings of Quran!

• Book of Al-Maeda, verse 33 (5:33) -“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;” OK, no beheading here, but if you attack ISIS you will be executed. No wonder you are for Qatar, Iran, Hamas, Turkey, Muslim Brotherhood. I never could understand why a nation like Qatar with only a few hundred thousand people will need 11 billion dollars in military supplies. Maybe to arm the Muslim Brotherhood? But Israel is the root of it all!
• Book of Al-Anfal, verse 12 ( 8:12) - “I (Allah) will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off.” A beheading! A beheading! Sounds like Monty Python a bit. 
• Book of Muhammad, verse 4 (47:4) - “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), strike off their heads” Repetitous? 
• Book of Al-Baqara, verse 193 (2:193) - “Fight them on until there is no more tumult and religion becomes that of Allah” 
• Book of Al-Tawba verse 29 (9:29) - "Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the last day... and fight People of the Book, (Christian and Jews) who do not accept the religion of truth (Islam) until they pay tribute (Jizyah tax) by hand, being inferior.” Well, both of these show what they think of us. World domination! But, remember that Christians are also in danger. No wonder Penelope Cruz is siding with Muslim's against Israel, she is scared of losing her head. George Galloway is just an idiot!

But is this what Mohammed wanted? The prophet of Islam?

The Banu Qurayza were a Jewish tribe, living in northern Arabia until the 7th century, having arrived there after the Jewish-Roman wars that took place in the area of Judea, 600 years before the first Muslim. This is a part of the area which you say there was never a Jewish presence. The Muslim prophet, Muhammad, created 25-day siege of the Jews and they eventually surrendered. Between 400-900 males were beheaded! This was Muhammad's way.

“There is absolutely nothing in Islam that justifies cutting off a person’s head," Yvonne Haddad, a professor at the Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University claimed.  Perhaps this Georgetown University professor has not read the Koran. She was born in Syria and is a professor, but I do not think much of her knowledge or understanding.

Why behead? We are dealing with terrorism and the point of terrorism is terror. Historically terrorists hijacked airliners, performed car bombings, and suicide bombings. But beheading is now cool. Car bombings and suicide bombings have become cliche. They're so commonplace the media has stopped reporting on them in any detail. As for airliners, they've become very difficult to hijack so such deeds have become rare. Who cares if these tactics are tried on Jews. Hey, for a Jew to defend himself it is now called against human rights!

If Israel is not around to protect you, will you still feel safe?

Tweet

An investigation into Israeli war crimes!

An investigation of Israeli war crimes!

Another investigation into Israeli war crimes in Gaza by the UNHCR or United Nations Human Rights Commission. Their mandate calls to “investigate all violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, particularly in the occupied Gaza Strip, in the context of the military operations conducted since 13 June 2014.”

OK, the mandate is flawed from the word go. Why? Occupied Gaza Strip? I agree that Gaza is being occupied by a heinous group that goes by the name Hamas, but why not call it that. But wait a minute, why is there no mention of Hamas and their war crimes? Human shields anyone? Targeting civilians anyone? What occupied Palestinian Territory? Forget that Palestine became Israel in 1948. Since when was so-called east Jerusalem Arab? OK, you got me there, it was Arab for a whole 19 years! That is it! Even then it was controlled as occupied Israeli territory! 

Any idea which country drafted the resolution? Interestingly it was not drafted by a country or a nation or even a people, it was drafted by the so-called Palestinian delegation. The same people that are carrying out war crimes in Gaza. A kangaroo court indeed. It is like a murderer accusing the prosecution.

But let us look at the makeup of the committee of inquiry. It is to be headed by a Professor William Schabas. William Schabas, has claimed that he wants to see Netanyahu tried by the ICC. Why? Because of the Goldstone Report on Operation Cast Lead. Forget the issue that Netanyahu was in the opposition at the time. It is of little interest because when it concerns the Palestine issue, facts are irrelevant. In essence, in very recent years, he has already shown an anti-Israel bias. "The suggestion that I'm anti-Israel is absurd," William Schabas said Monday in an interview, pointing out that he's on the editorial board of the Israel Law Review. Hmm, so what. It is like saying, "some of my best friends are Jewish."

In early 2013 at a tribunal on the issue of Palestine, Schabas said in a statement: Anyone who says that Israel has the right to exist – is considered our enemies. This is the person chosen to head the investigation in Israel! Perhaps William Schabas should be on trial for racism, along with Pillay!

So a blatantly anti-Israel person has been chosen to head a mission to investigate Israel? I have the feeling that the report has already been written and the verdict decided and they just need to fill in the blanks? Should Israel cooperate with Schabas? Does it matter? Facts are unimportant with the UNHCR. If facts are provided, they will be ignored. There are none so blind as those who will not see. Or as Goebbells once said, "if you tell a lie often enough, people will believe it is the truth". This is in essence the entire basis of the Palestinian narrative, a nation that does not exist before 1964 and was invented by the PLO as a political tool. In their own words: "The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism."

If Schabas had an ounce of integrity, he would have recused himself as any human would, but this is for the UN. Schabas has said that he can remain impartial. Not sure that he can judging by what he has said in the past, complaining not only about Netanyahu but also saying Shimon Peres needs to be judged at the ICC. He has already judged Israel.

Can he look at facts and draw the right conclusion? Well, let us look at the facts from the past. In a 2009 blog post about the UN’s infamous extremely racist Durban II conference on racism, Schabas urged the world not only to “ignore” Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s statements, but to stop “exaggerating”  them. According to Schabas, those who “deserve the blame” are “Israel and its friends, who have manipulated the truth about the nature of the work of the United Nations by gross exaggeration of the role and intervention of certain fanatics.” Schabas described Ahmadinejad as nothing more than a “provocative politician,” and not a torturer of dissidents, inciter of genocidal anti-Semitism, and arch-sponsor of terrorism. Need I say more? Israel manipulates the truth in his own words. Again does it matter what we say anymore?

I truly wonder at which university Schabas is a professor because I have my doubts at his integrity and knowledge. I have found that he currently works as an international law professor at Middlesex University in England. I pity his students.  He has written multiple books on the issue of international law, does that make him an expert. I wrote a book on dating, so I am an expert. 

What could the UNHCR have done differently? Well apart from getting rid of pillay, they could have investigated Syria, Sudan, Iran, Russia, the USA, France and I can go on, but double standards abound. Does it matter that people are being beheaded by Muslims. Israel cannot be blamed. Is it not a human right to keep your own head? Does it matter that if you do not convert to Islam, you can be killed. Does it matter what NATO did in Yugoslavia? Or Turkey did to the Kurdish people? Or the Syrians? Not at all, because Israel cannot be blamed.

In essence, it is not important who was selected to head this investigation as it was already decided that Israel is guilty. 

Tweet

Israel is guilty of war crimes!

Israel is guilty of war crimes

"Israel is guilty of heinous war crimes in its belligerent war that it started against Hamas!" Someone actually said that on Facebook. I saw this while reading a post from a Facebook friend. The person who posted this, a fellow author, was once on my list of Facebook friends. I unfriended him because I found him to be a rabid anti-Semite and rather than go into debates with him about how ridiculous his statements were, I unfriended him.

In the latest comment I started by saying that first Israel did not start a war with Hamas. It never has. It never will. It is against our own humanity, but remember not against British, French, Turkish, Russian, American etc ideals. They do initiate wars. Belligerent? Do you know what the word belligerent even means? It means hostile and aggressive. When has Israel ever and I mean ever been hostile or aggressive? Any war has been defensive due to the belligerency of the other side and in the case of Operation Protective Edge, Hamas' continuous unprovoked attacks against Israel. Heinous war crimes? What war crimes? Who decides?

Marc Lamont Hill who claims to be an American academic, journalist, author, activist, and television personality and a distinguished Professor of African American Studies at Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia, said on CNN: "The Iron Dome is exclusively a defensive mechanism, but what the Iron Dome does is it also takes away all of Hamas's military leverage which is very different than say, 10 years ago or 15 years ago in other wars like Lebanon, et cetera. As a result, it not only serves a defensive purpose but de facto serves an offensive purpose. It allows Israel to essentially assault and siege Gaza without any retribution or response on the other side. So again, to some extent, they are not just funding defense, they are funding an offensive war and ultimately an occupation. That for me, is the problem."

First of all, it will not be the first time that an imbecile became a professor, but did he really spew such absolute nonsense? Forget about the fact that this is not an offensive war, or that it is not an occupation or that it is not a siege, facts are not important with people who cannot see. He is trying to say that because Israel built a system to defend itself from Hamas rockets, it is a crime? In essence that means that if you wear a bullet proof vest that you designed to stop bullets from killing you, you are guilty of a crime? Or if you build a bullet proof car or a tank to protect you, you are guilty of a crime? Perhaps the only war crime is that very few Jews were killed. The Israeli army is called the "Israel Defense Forces" because it is a defensive force. We build technology to protect ourselves, while others build technology to destroy us. Mr Hill, I suggest that you do not use a Firewall on your computer. Why? It is a defensive force designed to keep others out. It was created by Israeli technology to stop cyber attacks. Do not use it, it is an offensive mechanism. Mr Hill, do not use any anti-virus software on your computer. Same reason and also designed by Israelis to protect us.

Actually all of you who hate us Israelis so much must stop using Firewalls or anti-viruses. Why stop there? Don't use mobile phones, or Intel-based computers either. That goes also for my former Facebook friends.

I wonder where Emile Zola is?

Is the so-called professor alone in claiming that the Iron Dome is a problem? No. The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, claimed that Israel is guilty of war crimes because we did not share our Iron Dome with Hamas. She also accused the United States saying: "They have not only provided the heavy weaponry which is now being used by Israel in Gaza but they’ve also provided almost $1 billion in providing the Iron Domes to protect the Israels from rocket attacks. But no such protection has been provided to Gazans against the shelling.” Is she serious? Actually one blogger amusingly posted this today: "It is really unfortunate that, when they were being marched to the gas chambers, the Jewish victims of Nazi aggression did not contemplate the effect their deaths would have on the German death-camp guards. Certainly, they are guilty of not having found some way to protect the Nazis from the psychological consequences of being compelled to murder large numbers of human beings." Well, this Navi Pallay, who established the infamous 2008 Goldstone commission, in which every member of the commission announced Israel's guilt before the investigation. A typical case of who cares about facts.

Former US president Jimmy Carter accuses Israel of 'deliberate attacks on civilians' saying there was no humane or legal justification for the way the IDF are conducting this war.  Really Jimmy? We know your feelings about Israel. Nothing new. But why must people listen to what he has to say. It is like Israel listening to what former prime minster Ehud Olmert has to say. But Carter goes on to show what he means, "Three Israeli civilians have been killed by Palestinian rockets, while an overwhelming majority of the 1,600 Palestinians killed have been civilians, including more than 330 children. The need for international judicial proceedings to investigate and end these violations of international law should be taken very seriously." So now we understand the real issue. Three Israeli civilians were killed. No mention of the 64 soldiers http://mfa.gov.il/MFA/ForeignPolicy/Terrorism/Pages/IDF-soldiers-killed-in-Operation-Protective-Edge.aspx killed  in the war, which is fine in war, but when talking about Arabs, he says "an overwhelming majority of the 1,600 Palestinians killed have been civilians". According to more accurate reports, 1000 of that majority were Hamas terrorists. But I guess Carter's main issue is that not enough Jews were killed.

Does anyone care about facts? Not really. In this conflict, pictures were displayed showing children who were killed once in Syria and then again in Gaza. Propaganda? Or maybe like the infamous Mohammed al-Durra incident which was staged and no one knows today whether al-Durra was actually killed or not. The US is equally to blame. There was an attack on Hamas terrorists on Sunday which was NEAR a school. Jennifer Psaki said in a statement, "The United States is appalled by today's disgraceful shelling outside an UNRWA school in Rafah sheltering some 3,000 displaced persons, in which at least 10 more Palestinian civilians were tragically killed." Well, unlike the UN she said OUTSIDE. "The coordinates of the school, like all UN facilities in Gaza, have been repeatedly communicated to the Israel Defense Forces," State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said. "We once again stress that Israel must do more to meet its own standards and avoid civilian casualties." So, she is at last admitting that we have standards which are far higher than the entire world. The IDF confirmed it had fired on a target "in the vicinity" of the school. "The IDF targeted three PIJ (Islamic Jihad) terrorists on board a motorcycle in the vicinity of an UNRWA school in Rafiah," the IDF said. However Psaki said the presence of terrorists near the facility could not excuse the attack. However, evidence is emerging that the Israeli strike hit outside of the school and the bodies were moved into the courtyard to make it look like Israel hit the school.” Will Obama apologize to Israel? Will the UN? Don’t hold your breath. “Sunday’s Gaza School Attack Now Appears To Be Staged,” by Jeff Dunetz, Truth Revolt, August 4, 2014.

There is ample evidence to show that Hamas uses civilians as shields. IDF forces in the Gaza Strip found a Hamas manual on “Urban Warfare,” which belonged to the Shuja’iya Brigade of Hamas’ military wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades. The manual explains how the civilian population can be used against IDF forces and reveals that Hamas knows the IDF is committed to minimizing harm to civilians. As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, "We are using missile defense to protect our civilians, and they're using their civilians to protect their missiles." But this is not enough for the world at large.




You complain about the disproportionate destruction because of our Iron Dome defensive capabilities. Well, for the past 2000 years you have massacred us, whenever you felt the need for taking out your own aggressions. You passed laws against us, limiting our means of making a living. Forced us to convert or shoved us into a synagogue and burned us alive. Carried out pogroms against us. The Germans had true genocide and massacred six milliuon of us while you stood by, shaking your heads, not even letting us find shelter. Now we have our own country and when we are attacked in our almost 70 years, you do nothing to protect us. Well dear world, I hate to tell you, but we do not rely on you. If we are attacked by a bully, we may turn the other cheek for a while, but if we hit back, we will hit back hard. Very hard. We will make it so that you think twice before attacking us again. If you do not like that, then stop attacking us. Stop trying to kill us. I am sorry that I am not prepared to die simply because you hate us so much. Our only war crime and actually our only crime, is that not enough of us were killed.

Question, if there were more Jews killed than Arabs, would you shed a tear? To all my friends who hate us Jews so much, don't use Facebook to spread your hatred as that was developed by a Jew as well.

Oh and by the way, if Israel is destroyed, will you feel safer?

Tweet

Free Palestine! Israel is guilty of Genocide!

Free Palestine.
Israel is guilty of Genocide.

Well, if that is what you think then you are either forced to think that, or have been threatened, or scared to say anything else, or have been paid to say that, or gullible, or brainwashed or simply too stupid to understand, or simply anti-Semitic, or emotionally disturbed. There can be no other reason. Take your pick.

If you are for human rights, then when did you take to the streets for the hundreds of thousands Syrians massacred? Or the Sudanese? Or the Iranians? Or the Chinese?

What about the Kurds who the Turks massacred? What about the Kurdish people who are truly a nation and deserve a homeland? What about ending Turkish occupation of Cyprus?

What about standing up for the poor people in Gaza who are oppressed by their leaders and threatened and killed? What about gays who are hanged in Iran? Or unmarried women in Iraq who are forced to work as prostitutes for the Muslim despots there? Where are you? Why is your voice not heard?

Why are you silent about the millions of hungry people in Africa?

Free Palestine, you say? From whom? In Gaza, they are free, there is no occupation there, so what are they resisting? The whole reason for Hamas' existence is violence and oppression and hatred. Why are you silent? Forget the fact that they were not there a hundred years ago. According to their own testaments, they came from Egypt and Saudi Arabia to be there in land that we cultivated. For you that is irrelevant. It was never Arab. We gave it to them.

Genocide. Do you have any idea what that means? Look it up in the dictionary. You can apply it to Turkey, Syria, Sudan and others. You can pin it on what the Europeans tried to do us during the Crusades, the Inquisition and countless other periods in history. But if you try to pin it on Gaza, then you are an absolute idiot. By the way, if Israel wanted to commit genocide in Gaza, we could do it in a few hours. No Gaza, no problems.

You say that over a thousand people were killed in Gaza creating a humanitarian crisis. Well, first of all, find out how many of those people were first killed in Syria and then killed again in Gaza. Sounds silly? But some of the images you are using were first used in Syria. Israel sent over food, truckloads of it. Medicine, even created a hospital. It was rejected. Not by the people in Gaza, but by their leaders who do not live there. We pay for their electricity. How do they repay us? By destroying the power plant that generates electricity for them.
Oh, by the way, try and figure out how Haled Mashal is worth over 2 billion dollars.

If there is no Israel, will you be safe? If you say yes, then i am right.

There Are None So Blind, As Those Who Will Not See

According to the ‘Random House Dictionary of Popular Proverbs and Sayings’ this proverb has been traced back to 1546 (John Heywood), and resembles the Biblical verse Jeremiah 5:21 (‘Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not’).

Free Palestine? It is already free.

Tweet

Saving Mr Banks

Are you going to see the movie "Saving Mr Banks"?

British actress Emma Thompson calls for boycotting Israel's Habima theater. The least we can do is return the favor and boycott her recent movie 'Saving Mr. Banks' and any other movie she stars in.

The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) has condemned actress Emma Thompson and three dozen other British actors, for seeking the boycotting of Israel’s celebrated Habima Theater troupe, which is to perform later this year in a six-week theatrical festival taking place at Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre in London. Thompson and her colleagues cite spurious human rights concerns but hypocritically fail to call for a boycott of the National Theater of China, which is participating in the same festival. The ZOA has condemned Thompson and urged people to boycott her recently-released movie, Saving Mr. Banks.

In a letter to the British Guardian newspaper, Thompson and her colleagues accused Habima of having “a shameful record of involvement with illegal Israeli settlements in Occupied Palestinian Territory [sic] ... By inviting Habima, Shakespeare’s Globe is undermining the conscientious Israeli actors and playwrights who have refused to break international law ... by inviting Habima, the Globe is associating itself with policies of exclusion practiced by the Israeli state and endorsed by its national theatre company ... We ask the Globe to withdraw the invitation so that the festival is not complicit with human rights violations and the illegal colonization of occupied land” (Nathan Burstein, ‘Oscar winner Emma Thompson calls for Israeli theater’s ban,’ Times of Israel, April 1, 2014).

ZOA National President Morton A. Klein said, “We condemn Emma Thompson and her colleagues for their advocacy of boycotting Israel’s famed Habima Theater. Their call is in no way justified, or in any way less serious or worthy of condemnation, because Habima has refused to boycott a cultural center that opened in Ariel.

“Jews have a perfect right in law and morality to live and build homes and communities in Judea and Samaria, part of the territory earmarked for Jewish settlement at the 1920 San Remo Conference. Contrary to Thompson’s ignorant/malicious claim of illegality, the right of Jews to live and settle in these territories has never been extinguished by any subsequent, legally binding international agreement. Moreover, under the Oslo II agreement, it was specifically stated in Chapter 3, Article 17 that the Jewish communities of Judea, Samaria and Gaza would remain under Israeli jurisdiction, pending a final peace agreement. In other words, the PA itself has signed a legally binding agreement that explicitly accepts the existence of Jewish communities under Israeli control.

“Jewish growth in Judea and Samaria and eastern Jerusalem has a fundamental legitimacy and poses no obstacle to a true peace if Palestinians are ready for one, so the repeated, periodic international calls for a Jewish construction freeze, or the removal of Jewish communities, or the boycott and ostracism of anyone who fails to oppose their existence, would remain inappropriate even if the prospect of genuine peace negotiations with a truly peaceful Palestinian partner were possible.

“Why may not 300,000 Jews live among 2 million Arabs in Judea and Samaria while 1.2 million Arabs live among 6 million Jews in Israel? Emma Thompson and her colleagues are displaying ignorance and prejudice in working towards a world in which Jews are banned from and expelled from their religious, historical and legal homeland.

“These people claim to be concerned about justice and peace. But one never hears them criticize the Palestinian rejection of Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state, or their rejection of the 2000 Clinton peace plan, or their resort to a wave of terror. They never issue statements demanding that the PA end terror and incitement to hatred and murder against Israel – the demonization of Jews does not disturb these haters of the Jewish state and expose their own vicious bias, dressed up as concern for human rights.

“We also note the rank hypocrisy of Thompson and her ilk condemning Habima and seeking its boycott –– but having no problem with the National Theater of China participating in the same festival, even though China’s observance of human rights is, to put it mildly, abysmal.

“Emma Thompson and these other actors are clearly people who, because they are celebrities, enjoy unmerited influence and ability to publicize their political views. This places an even greater responsibility on them to think carefully before speaking on political matters, which they have clearly failed. They deserve to be condemned and shunned by the Jewish, pro-Israeli community and all other people of goodwill. We urge everyone to boycott Emma Thompson’s current movie, Saving Mr. Banks.”

Note: This was sent to me in an e-mail. I posted it here for the world to see.

Tweet

Why is Kerry pushing Israel?

John Kerry is once again here to try and push Israel into signing away part of her territory. We have to wonder why he is doing this. Why does he keep coming back to Israel? Why does he keep putting pressure on Israel?

What will a  peace agreement with another Arab entity bring Israel? Let us try and understand for ourselves, assuming we are allowed to think!

Will it bring security? We know it will not. We have seen evidence of that in Egypt and Jordan. We have to keep protecting ourselves. Can the Americans protect Israel? Hello...Anyone hear of Obama? The Americans failed in Afghanistan, Iraq and other places. They turned their backs on their allies and are actively arming terrorists and terrorist states. They now believe that the only terrorist entity is Al-Qaeda, so how can anyone believe them. Not even the Saudis believe the Americans anymore. Israel also has had bad experiences from the US-trained terrorist forces in the so-called West Bank.

Will it bring peace? We know it will not. Once again, look at Egypt and Jordan and I will throw in Mauritania as well. But look at the people some consider Palestinians, although they are not. A treaty was signed with them in 1994. Have they stood by that agreement, IN ANYTHING? In addition who are we negotiating with? Mahmoud Abbas? His mandate run out in 2009. He has no mandate to sign a deal and any deal he signs will not include Gaza as Hamas does not want him there. That is why he keeps running to the Arab League, maybe they will help him. On the other hand, they are so divided that one wonders if anyone can trust them with a deal. At the moment, Abbas is simply a dictator. Incidentally Abbas wrote his doctorate denying the Holocaust. Under the laws of many European countries he should be prosecuted. So...

Does any part belong to the Arabs? Not at all! Not under any format of international law! The land that people call the West Bank or the pre-1967 borders are not borders at all. They are ceasefire lines and not international borders. They were occupied lands until 1967 when they were returned to Israel, the real Palestinians. It is not only the 1920 San Remo conference that defined this and was later ratified, it has always been Jewish. Are any of the towns that the Arabs reside in actually Arab? Even Bethlehem is a Hebrew name. 

In the eyes of the Arabs pushing Israel to an agreement is only the first step. Remember the original agreement was called Gaza-Jericho first? First did not only mean the first city in the West Bank! 

So, Kerry is pushing Israel and not the Palestinians. Why? He failed in Syria, although he is great Syria supporter. He failed in Iran. He did not fail in Libya, that is a total Obama and Clinton fiasco. But there are so many hotspots all over the world, including the Kurdish nation who are entitled to a homeland. Why is he not pushing the so-called Arab entity that is today known as the Palestinians, a totally invented nation? Why Israel? 

Simply because he can. Israel is the last country in the world who is a true ally of the United States and the only country that can be pushed. What is Kerry doing? If you do not do what I tell you, you will be isolated and we will not stand by you! Is that a friend?

I ask you all to think, if Israel signs a treaty, will you still feel safe?

Tweet