I call for an international summit to discuss the issue of dividing France into two countries for two nations, the French nation which will retain the name Republic of France and the other nation will be the Islamic Caliphate of France with Paris as its capital. If the French do not agree, then it will be illegal for a person of French origin to live in occupied Paris. They must withdraw from Paris and all parts of Eastern and southern France before November 2017. If not, they will be in violation of international law.
Does this sound familiar to you? We have been saying the same idea for years. Although this is supposed to be a joke based on the idea of the upcoming French initiative in which they said that if Israel does not accept their conditions, they will recognize a Palestinian State on Israeli territory. Now, any idiot will say, unless you are a French politician or a member of the radical far-left, if that is the case, the Palestinians will get everything they demand, despite having absolutely no rights, not legally, historical, moral or religious, so why should they negotiate? Because the French want to feel important! Forget the small issue that the French initiative is in TOTAL VIOLATION of international law of which they are signatories, not one of the multitude of Islamic countries, but the French. They want to feel important, on the backs of others.
But in essence, do the Arabs want another failed state? They have rejected overtures very often. Who will line their pockets if they get a state? How will the leaders get their billions? Look at the billionaires: Ismail Haniya, Khaled Mashal, Mahmood Abbas and Saeb Arekat. Look at how Yassir Arafat milked the coffers to become a billionaire.
I call for an international summit to discuss the issue of dividing France into two nations for two peoples, the French nation which will retain the name Republic of France and the Islamic Caliphate of France with Paris as its capital.
Let us continue with my satire:
The terror attacks in France have shown that it is time to make necessary changes in France. No longer can the French accept living in terror. No longer must they execute without trial, poor Muslims who simply want to murder people. Muslims are clearly waging war on France to transform the county into Dar Al Islam and it is time that France must start negotiations with them. The world now realizes that France cannot do it themselves, so we call on the international summit. If they fail, we will divide France unilaterally as they did in the Middle East over a 100 years ago.
Isn't my attempt at humor similar to what is happening at the moment? As I have blogged before, Sharia Law divides the world into two domains Dar Al-Harb ( (territory of war or chaos) and Dar Al-Islam (territory of submission). Any place ruled by the laws of Islam even if the majority of the inhabitants are not Muslim is considered Dar Al Islam and no longer needs to be conquered.
Some people say that Israel should give the French a chance, should we trust the French? Well let us look at our history with France. During the first crusade (1096), a thousand years ago, the French placed Jews of Rouen in a Church and murdered them. Jews throughout France were at that time in great fear, and wrote to their brothers in the Rhine countries making known to them their terror and asking them to fast and pray. In the Rhineland thousands of Jews were killed by the crusaders. The French stole our property. Then there were expulsions, massacres, allowing us to return, expulsions, massacres, and a cycle. We stupidly did return. Who understands why? But hatred of Jews reigned for a thousand years in France. Dreyfus case anyone? That was only a 100 years ago. Holocaust? The French were willing partners. What about their actions against Israel since 1967? Will the French ever return all the money, land an other property they stole from us? Probably valued today as 1000 Trillion dollars. That would help my own bank account a bit. Jews have been living in France for more years than there was an Islamic presence in France, or even in Israel, should we also demand a part of France as a satellite of Israel?
U.S. journalist James Foley was brutally be-headed in a video broadcast to the world. This was taped by ISIS or Dayish or Islamic State or whatever you want to call them. US President Barack Obama said the beheading of Foley was "an act of violence that shocks the conscience of the entire world". The President slammed ISIS, saying the militants speak for no religion, and that no faith teaches others to massacre innocents as ISIS does. Oh really, Mr Obama? Have you read the Koran? He gave the statement before he went off to play golf. Perhaps it is his job to play golf while the world burns? Reminds me of Roman Emperor Nero who played the fiddle while Rome burned.
Is this the first beheading of a journalist? How can we forget the murder of Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journal reporter who was executed in Pakistan in 2002. Both were working for American news outlets. Both were captured by so-called Islamist "extremists" and had video recordings of their executions released. In 2007, the Turkish despot, Erdogan claimed "The Term ‘Moderate Islam’ Is Ugly And Offensive; There Is No Moderate Islam; Islam Is Islam.” So in essence, Foley and Pearl were murdered by regular Muslims much like Erdogan himself is.
In 2013, two men attacked a man believed to be a British soldier in the London neighborhood of Woolwich. A video broadcast by the U.K. network ITV purports to show one of the two attackers explaining himself to a camera immediately after the attack. Here's what he said: "We swear by Almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you....You people will never be safe." Eyewitnesses described the attack as a "beheading." Have you forgotten?
We should not really talk about Britain that much as it has already been overrun by Islam. Remember this joke from 2009?
A Royal Navy destroyer finds four Muslims in a row boat in the Channel, rowing towards England. The captain gets on the loud haler and shouts, "Ahoy, small craft, where are you heading?"
One of the Muslims stands up and shouts, "We are invading the UK!"
The crew of the destroyer keel over laughing. When the captain finally recovers, he gets back on the loud haler and says, "Just the four of you?"
The Muslim stands up again and shouts,
"No, we're the last four ... the rest are already there!"
Or this one:
Registry on the first day back at school in Birmingham, ENGLAND The teacher began calling out the names of the pupils:-
"Mustafa Al Eih Zeri?" "Here"
"Achmed El Kabul?" "Here"
"Fatima Al Hayek? "
"Here"
"Ali Abdul Olmi?" "Here"
"Mohammed Bin Kadir?" "Here"
"Ali Son al En” - silence in the classroom. "Ali Son al En" - continued silence as everyone looked around the room. The teacher repeated the
call.
A girl stood up and said, "Sorry teacher. I think that's me. It's pronounced Alison Allen."
Particularly relevant as kids have just gone back to school after a vacation.
It is little wonder that Eurabia and England keep attacking Israel seeing as how they are so ridden with the same extremist religion
that they drove out over a thousand years ago. Do not say we did not warn you.
But dear Obama, beheading is exactly Mulslim culture and consistent with the sacred teachings of Quran!
Book of Al-Maeda, verse 33 (5:33) -“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;” OK, no beheading here, but if you attack ISIS you will be executed. No wonder you are for Qatar, Iran, Hamas, Turkey, Muslim Brotherhood. I never could understand why a nation like Qatar with only a few hundred thousand people will need 11 billion dollars in military supplies. Maybe to arm the Muslim Brotherhood? But Israel is the root of it all!
Book of Al-Anfal, verse 12 ( 8:12) - “I (Allah) will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off.” A beheading! A beheading! Sounds like Monty Python a bit.
Book of Muhammad, verse 4 (47:4) - “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), strike off their heads” Repetitous?
Book of Al-Baqara, verse 193 (2:193) - “Fight them on until there is no more tumult and religion becomes that of Allah”
Book of Al-Tawba verse 29 (9:29) - "Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the last day... and fight People of the Book, (Christian and Jews) who do not accept the religion of truth (Islam) until they pay
tribute (Jizyah tax) by hand, being inferior.” Well, both of these show what they think of us. World domination! But, remember that Christians are also in danger. No wonder Penelope Cruz is siding with Muslim's against Israel, she is scared of losing her head. George Galloway is just an idiot!
But is this what Mohammed wanted? The prophet of Islam?
The Banu Qurayza were a Jewish tribe, living in northern Arabia until the 7th century, having arrived there after the Jewish-Roman wars that took place in the area of Judea, 600 years before the first Muslim. This is a part of the area which you say there was never a Jewish presence. The Muslim prophet, Muhammad, created 25-day siege of the Jews and they eventually surrendered. Between 400-900 males were beheaded! This was Muhammad's way.
“There is absolutely nothing in Islam that justifies cutting off a person’s head," Yvonne Haddad, a professor at the Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University claimed. Perhaps this Georgetown University professor has not read the Koran. She was born in Syria and is a professor, but I do not think much of her knowledge or understanding.
Why behead? We are dealing with terrorism and the point of terrorism is terror. Historically terrorists hijacked airliners, performed car bombings, and suicide bombings. But beheading is now cool. Car bombings and suicide bombings have become cliche. They're so commonplace the media has stopped reporting on them in any detail. As for airliners, they've become very difficult to hijack so such deeds have become rare. Who cares if these tactics are tried on Jews. Hey, for a Jew to defend himself it is now called against human rights!
If Israel is not around to protect you, will you still feel safe?
"Israel is guilty of heinous war crimes in its belligerent war that it started against Hamas!" Someone actually said that on Facebook. I saw this while reading a post from a Facebook friend. The person who posted this, a fellow author, was once on my list of Facebook friends. I unfriended him because I found him to be a rabid anti-Semite and rather than go into debates with him about how ridiculous his statements were, I unfriended him.
In the latest comment I started by saying that first Israel did not start a war with Hamas. It never has. It never will. It is against our own humanity, but remember not against British, French, Turkish, Russian, American etc ideals. They do initiate wars. Belligerent? Do you know what the word belligerent even means? It means hostile and aggressive. When has Israel ever and I mean ever been hostile or aggressive? Any war has been defensive due to the belligerency of the other side and in the case of Operation Protective Edge, Hamas' continuous unprovoked attacks against Israel. Heinous war crimes? What war crimes? Who decides?
Marc Lamont Hill who claims to be an American academic, journalist, author, activist, and television personality and a distinguished Professor of African American Studies at Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia, said on CNN: "The Iron Dome is exclusively a defensive mechanism, but what the Iron Dome does is it also takes away all of Hamas's military leverage which is very different than say, 10 years ago or 15 years ago in other wars like Lebanon, et cetera. As a result, it not only serves a defensive purpose but de facto serves an offensive purpose. It allows Israel to essentially assault and siege Gaza without any retribution or response on the other side. So again, to some extent, they are not just funding defense, they are funding an offensive war and ultimately an occupation. That for me, is the problem."
First of all, it will not be the first time that an imbecile became a professor, but did he really spew such absolute nonsense? Forget about the fact that this is not an offensive war, or that it is not an occupation or that it is not a siege, facts are not important with people who cannot see. He is trying to say that because Israel built a system to defend itself from Hamas rockets, it is a crime? In essence that means that if you wear a bullet proof vest that you designed to stop bullets from killing you, you are guilty of a crime? Or if you build a bullet proof car or a tank to protect you, you are guilty of a crime? Perhaps the only war crime is that very few Jews were killed. The Israeli army is called the "Israel Defense Forces" because it is a defensive force. We build technology to protect ourselves, while others build technology to destroy us. Mr Hill, I suggest that you do not use a Firewall on your computer. Why? It is a defensive force designed to keep others out. It was created by Israeli technology to stop cyber attacks. Do not use it, it is an offensive mechanism. Mr Hill, do not use any anti-virus software on your computer. Same reason and also designed by Israelis to protect us.
Actually all of you who hate us Israelis so much must stop using Firewalls or anti-viruses. Why stop there? Don't use mobile phones, or Intel-based computers either. That goes also for my former Facebook friends.
I wonder where Emile Zola is?
Is the so-called professor alone in claiming that the Iron Dome is a problem? No. The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, claimed that Israel is guilty of war crimes because we did not share our Iron Dome with Hamas. She also accused the United States saying: "They have not only provided the heavy weaponry which is now being used by Israel in Gaza but they’ve also provided almost $1 billion in providing the Iron Domes to protect the Israels from rocket attacks. But no such protection has been provided to Gazans against the shelling.” Is she serious? Actually one blogger amusingly posted this today: "It is really unfortunate that, when they were being marched to the gas chambers, the Jewish victims of Nazi aggression did not contemplate the effect their deaths would have on the German death-camp guards. Certainly, they are guilty of not having found some way to protect the Nazis from the psychological consequences of being compelled to murder large numbers of human beings." Well, this Navi Pallay, who established the infamous 2008 Goldstone commission, in which every member of the commission announced Israel's guilt before the investigation. A typical case of who cares about facts.
Former US president Jimmy Carter accuses Israel of 'deliberate attacks on civilians' saying there was no humane or legal justification for the way the IDF are conducting this war. Really Jimmy? We know your feelings about Israel. Nothing new. But why must people listen to what he has to say. It is like Israel listening to what former prime minster Ehud Olmert has to say. But Carter goes on to show what he means, "Three Israeli civilians have been killed by Palestinian rockets, while an overwhelming majority of the 1,600 Palestinians killed have been civilians, including more than 330 children. The need for international judicial proceedings to investigate and end these violations of international law should be taken very seriously." So now we understand the real issue. Three Israeli civilians were killed. No mention of the 64 soldiers http://mfa.gov.il/MFA/ForeignPolicy/Terrorism/Pages/IDF-soldiers-killed-in-Operation-Protective-Edge.aspx killed in the war, which is fine in war, but when talking about Arabs, he says "an overwhelming majority of the 1,600 Palestinians killed have been civilians". According to more accurate reports, 1000 of that majority were Hamas terrorists. But I guess Carter's main issue is that not enough Jews were killed.
Does anyone care about facts? Not really. In this conflict, pictures were displayed showing children who were killed once in Syria and then again in Gaza. Propaganda? Or maybe like the infamous Mohammed al-Durra incident which was staged and no one knows today whether al-Durra was actually killed or not. The US is equally to blame. There was an attack on Hamas terrorists on Sunday which was NEAR a school. Jennifer Psaki said in a statement, "The United States is appalled by today's disgraceful shelling outside an UNRWA school in Rafah sheltering some 3,000 displaced persons, in which at least 10 more Palestinian civilians were tragically killed." Well, unlike the UN she said OUTSIDE. "The coordinates of the school, like all UN facilities in Gaza, have been repeatedly communicated to the Israel Defense Forces," State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said. "We once again stress that Israel must do more to meet its own standards and avoid civilian casualties." So, she is at last admitting that we have standards which are far higher than the entire world. The IDF confirmed it had fired on a target "in the vicinity" of the school. "The IDF targeted three PIJ (Islamic Jihad) terrorists on board a motorcycle in the vicinity of an UNRWA school in Rafiah," the IDF said. However Psaki said the presence of terrorists near the facility could not excuse the attack. However, evidence is emerging that the Israeli strike hit outside of the school and the bodies were moved into the courtyard to make it look like Israel hit the school.” Will Obama apologize to Israel? Will the UN? Don’t hold your breath. “Sunday’s Gaza School Attack Now Appears To Be Staged,” by Jeff Dunetz, Truth Revolt, August 4, 2014.
There is ample evidence to show that Hamas uses civilians as shields. IDF forces in the Gaza Strip found a Hamas manual on “Urban Warfare,” which belonged to the Shuja’iya Brigade of Hamas’ military wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades. The manual explains how the civilian population can be used against IDF forces and reveals that Hamas knows the IDF is committed to minimizing harm to civilians. As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, "We are using missile defense to protect our civilians, and they're using their civilians to protect their missiles." But this is not enough for the world at large.
You complain about the disproportionate destruction because of our Iron Dome defensive capabilities.
Well, for the past 2000 years you have massacred us, whenever you felt the need for taking out your own aggressions. You passed laws against us, limiting our means of making a living. Forced us to convert or shoved us into a synagogue and burned us alive. Carried out pogroms against us. The Germans had true genocide and massacred six milliuon of us while you stood by, shaking your heads, not even letting us find shelter. Now we have our own country and when we are attacked in our almost 70 years, you do nothing to protect us. Well dear world, I hate to tell you, but we do not rely on you. If we are attacked by a bully, we may turn the other cheek for a while, but if we hit back, we will hit back hard. Very hard. We will make it so that you think twice before attacking us again. If you do not like that, then stop attacking us. Stop trying to kill us. I am sorry that I am not prepared to die simply because you hate us so much. Our only war crime and actually our only crime, is that not enough of us were killed.
Question, if there were more Jews killed than Arabs, would you shed a tear? To all my friends who hate us Jews so much, don't use Facebook to spread your hatred as that was developed by a Jew as well.
Oh and by the way, if Israel is destroyed, will you feel safer?
Well, if that is what you think then you are either forced to think that, or have been threatened, or scared to say anything else, or have been paid to say
that, or gullible, or brainwashed or simply too stupid to understand, or simply anti-Semitic, or emotionally disturbed. There can be no other reason. Take your pick.
If you are for human rights, then when did you take to the streets for the hundreds of thousands Syrians massacred? Or the Sudanese? Or the Iranians? Or the Chinese?
What about the Kurds who the Turks massacred? What about the Kurdish people who are truly a nation and deserve a homeland? What about ending Turkish occupation of Cyprus?
What about standing up for the poor people in Gaza who are oppressed by their leaders and threatened and killed? What about gays who are hanged in Iran? Or unmarried women in Iraq who are forced to work as
prostitutes for the Muslim despots there? Where are you? Why is your voice not heard?
Why are you silent about the millions of hungry people in Africa?
Free Palestine, you say? From whom? In Gaza, they are free, there is no occupation there, so what are they resisting? The whole reason for Hamas' existence is violence and oppression and hatred. Why are you silent? Forget the fact that they were not there a hundred years ago. According to their own testaments, they came from Egypt and Saudi Arabia to be there in land that we cultivated. For you that is irrelevant. It was never Arab. We gave it to them.
Genocide. Do you have any idea what that means? Look it up in the dictionary. You can apply it to Turkey, Syria, Sudan and others. You can pin it on what the Europeans tried to do us during the Crusades, the Inquisition and countless other periods in history. But if you try to pin it on Gaza, then you are an absolute idiot. By the way, if Israel wanted to commit genocide in Gaza, we could do it in a few
hours. No Gaza, no problems.
You say that over a thousand people were killed in Gaza creating a humanitarian crisis. Well, first of all, find out how many of those people were first killed in Syria and then killed again in Gaza. Sounds silly? But some of the images you are using were first used in Syria. Israel sent over food, truckloads of it. Medicine, even created a hospital. It was rejected. Not by the people in Gaza, but by their leaders who do not live there. We pay for their electricity. How do they repay us? By destroying the power plant that generates electricity for them.
Oh, by the way, try and figure out how Haled Mashal is worth over 2 billion dollars.
If there is no Israel, will you be safe? If you say yes, then i am right.
There Are None So Blind, As Those Who Will Not See
According to the ‘Random House Dictionary of Popular Proverbs and Sayings’ this proverb has been traced back to 1546 (John Heywood), and resembles the Biblical verse Jeremiah 5:21 (‘Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not’).
For as long as I can remember, there have been calls to boycott Israel. Of course these calls for boycotting Israel are simply a continuation of the Nazi boycott on Jewish business which started as far back as April 1933. The Nazi propaganda machine was continued with great success by the Arabs, so much so that even actors such as Emma Thompson have decided to boycott Habima. It is beyond logic why they would boycott Habima yet allow a "Palestinian" group to perform. There are many other dubious nations that were due to perform in London. What is also strange is that an Israeli company was boycotted in which they were going to show the "Merchant of Venice" in which the main character, Shylock, was outcast for being a Jew. Of course anti-Antisemitism is rampant in British literature through the ages.
Hot on the heels of the Nazi boycott of Jewish goods in 1933 was a boycott by the Arab Executive Committee in Syria. Coincidence? In 1945, the Arab League was created and very soon declared a formal boycott "Jewish products and manufactured goods shall be considered undesirable to the Arab countries." The Arab boycott on Israel was adopted after the 1948 war. The Central Boycott Office was headquartered in Damascus.
The boycott called for boycotting:
Products and services that originate in Israel
Businesses in non-Arab countries that do business with Israel
Businesses shipped or flew to Israeli ports
Branches were setup in many Arab countries such as the beautiful Abu Dhabi where it received government status.
In 1977 the United States Congress passed a law that then-President Jimmy Carter signed, and according to which fines would be levied on American companies which cooperate with the boycott. One of the few good things that Carter did.
The boycott made strange claims such as a boycott against Coca Cola which had refused to do business in Israel. In 1961 in Cairo involving a civil servant who come into possession of a Coca-Cola bottle manufactured in Ethiopia and mistook the Amharic lettering on its label for Hebrew. He publicly accused Coca-Cola of doing business with Israel. Or the Egyptian Muslim cleric that called on the Muslim and Arab world to boycott Starbucks because he claimed that the female character depicted in the company’s logo is actually Queen Esther, the heroine in the story of Purim.
But through all this I really do not understand why they do not boycott Israeli technology such as cellphones, internet messaging and even their computers. Not to mention the many life saving procedures that Israel has given the world.
Do not mistake a boycott of Israel as a result of any conflict with the Arabs. This is of course an Arab-inflicted conflict. The boycott is simply anti-Semitism. I am all for boycotts, but do it properly. Stop using mobile phones. Emma, what has any Arab nation given the world?
I call for an international summit to discuss the issue of dividing France into two countries for two nations, the French nation which will retain the name Republic of France and the other nation will be the Islamic Caliphate of France with Paris as its capital. If the French do not agree, then it will be illegal for a person of French origin to live in occupied Paris. They must withdraw from Paris and all parts of Eastern and southern France before November 2017. If not, they will be in violation of international law.
