Monday, December 26, 2016

Another anti-Israel Resolution at the Security Council

Another anti-Israel Resolution at the Security Council

On Christmas eve, the Americans pushed for a Security Council vote against Israel which passed. Why did it pass? Because the Americans did not veto it. A day earlier, Egypt pushed for the same vote but withdrew it probably because of President elect Trump. So, who asked for it in the end? New Zealand, a Christian country, among others. Why is it relevant that New Zealand, a Christian country pushed for it? You will soon understand.

Why did Obama push for this? Why did Kerry push for this? Why did the Security Council allow this? All simple. They wanted to leave a mark on something. I would say that it is because of pure hatred and vindictiveness but I will not. Obama was a huge failure as a president. He took a 6 trillion dollar deficit and almost quadrupled it. China owes a huge chunk of the US national debt. What if they come to Trump and ask for him to repay the debt? The Security Council and Obama are responsible for the death of over half a million Syrians, yet instead of dealing with that, they condemn Israel for building in her own homeland. Can you fathom that? Pure hypocrisy.

The resolution against "settlements" is a joke, the wording is unbelievable and actually goes against all international law, if the UN had any idea what international law is. It also goes against previous binding Security Council resolutions such as 242. Strangely Russia and China are occupying nations so why would they let this resolution pass? Quite unbelievable.

Let us look at some of the text of the resolution:

  1. Reaffirms that the establishment by Israel of settlements in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-State solution and a just, lasting and comprehensive peace; This statement is an affront to any logic. It goes against the law written down in 1921. What Palestinian territory? There was no Palestinian territory. When the PLO was created in 1964, they claimed that the area occupied by Jordan which people now call the West Bank, was not a part of their demands. East Jerusalem was Jewish for 4000 years. Actually King David paid money for it, although he had no need to. Why does it matter that New Zealand is a Christian country and this was a nice gift? Have you read the bible? Even the old testament? Isn't New Zealand itself an occupying power? Isn't America with its own occupation of Texas? China? Russia? Spain with its control of Catalonia? Catalonia recently demanded to be free from Spain, but Madrid rejected this.
  2. Reiterates its demand that Israel immediately and completely cease all settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and that it fully respect all of its legal obligations in this regard; This statement is an affront to any logic. It goes against the law written down in 1921. What occupied Palestinian territory? Since when was it occupied? Who are we occupying it from? Up until the Jordanian occupation, it was Judea and Samaria. If you want to use a legal term, you can refer to it as disputed territories.
  3. Underlines that it will not recognize any changes to the 4 June 1967 lines, including with regard to Jerusalem, other than those agreed by the parties through negotiations; Hello, heard of 242? Oslo? Do you know that the 4th June 1967 line was simply a ceasefire line? The cease-fire agreements of 1949 that delimited them explicitly say that they are just the lines marking the locations of the armies when the shooting stopped. They are not borders meaning that they have no political significance. Do you know that it was the Arabs who insisted on this because they wanted to gain more territory in the future?
  4. Stresses that the cessation of all Israeli settlement activities is essential for salvaging the two-State solution, and calls for affirmative steps to be taken immediately to reverse the negative trends on the ground that are imperiling the two-State solution; What two-state solution now?
  5. Calls upon all States, bearing in mind paragraph 1 of this resolution, to distinguish, in their relevant dealings, between the territory of the State of Israel and the territories occupied since 1967; Well, now the BDS are going to have fun. Little wonder that BDS stands for Brain Dysfunction Syndrome.

What actually happened was that with the aid of Obama and the French, the Palestinians have hijacked every major UN institution! This is in total disrespect of every agreement they signed with Israel. New Zealand explained their un-Christian like action as Israeli settlements are “the single biggest threat to peace” and the “primary threat to the viability of the two-state solution." Are they being serious? Are they totally brain dead? Settlements? Not the fact that the Palestinians were offered statehood in 2000, 2009 and 2014 and turned to pure terror. Ukraine said they voted because it was balanced. Is everyone that stupid? What this resolution has shown is that terror works. Why should the Arabs negotiate? The UN just hands them everything on a platter.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”― Edmund Burke

Barely 70 years ago the world defeated Nazis. Now pure evil has risen again, but this time far worse.

Can anyone trust the Obama administration? Will the world survive this new evil.

Sunday, November 20, 2016

Islamification of America

Islamification of America

Whoever does not think that Islam has taken over America should read this blog. Forget the fact that President Obama refuses to recognize that Islam is behind the world terror in the past few years. The American government is riddled with Islamists and it is getting worse:

John Brennan, current head of the CIA converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia as I mentioned in a previous post. He even refers to Jerusalem as Al-Quds.

John Kerry's son-in-law is Iranian with family still in Iran. Tell me that did not influence the Iran nuclear deal.

Obama's top adviser, Valerie Jarrett, is a Muslim who was born in Iran where her parents still live.

Hillary Clinton's top adviser, Huma Abedin is a Muslim, whose mother and brother are involved in the now outlawed Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

Hillary Clinton's new running mate, Virginia Senator Tim Kaine, has a history of embracing Islamists. He appointed a Hamas supporter to a state immigration commission; spoke at a dinner honoring a Muslim Brotherhood terror suspect; and received donations from well-known Islamist groups. He came under suspicion by the FBI more than once when the FBI was still allowed to investigate Islam.

Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for Homeland Security, Arif Aikhan, is a Muslim.

Homeland Security Adviser, Mohammed Elibiary, is a Muslim.

Obama adviser and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, Salam al-Marayati, is a Muslim.

Obama's Sharia Czar, Imam Mohamed Magid, of the Islamic Society of North America is a Muslim.

Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships, Eboo Patel, is a Muslim.

November 8, 2016, the day America fought back

Let us face it, Hilary Clinton was a very bad candidate as was Bernie Sanders. HRC's main advisor was a proponent of Sharia and so were many of her backers.

So people said "what difference does a few emails make?" or "so she made a mistake" and if the FBI did not find anything incriminating, she must be innocent. OK, people, wake up. She tried to destroy the emails. She destroyed 13 smartphones with a hammer. Suspicious? Even more suspicious was that Loretta Lynch, the DOJ, was also Bill Clinton's lawyer against all those women who accused him. He and Lynch met together and the next day she decides not to indict his wife? How about a rumor that says that the wife of the head of FBI was given money by the Clinton Foundation? Do I know if these are true or not, NOPE. But there is too much. One thing for sure, she does not know what the truth is. She also said that you must have two views, one public and one private and carry out your private views. Hello, that is the Islamic method.

If it is true or not that during her time as Secretary of State, people paid the Clinton Foundation for a meeting with her, I do not really know. I just know that her advisors are also pro J-Street and that is as bad as there is. George Sorros seems hell bent on destroying America. So America fought back. They wanted change. Has HRC or Obama condemned the riots? Not at all. Obama fueled them while on a trip to Europe, paid for by the American people. Any idea why he went to Europe? A lame duck president?

Donald Trump was not a good candidate, but with 400 million people, he was the best that America had to offer. I wonder if he is going to #DrainTheSwamp and get rid of the Islamic hold of America and make America great again?

November 8, 2016, the American Spring

Sunday, May 22, 2016

The French Peace Initiative

The French Peace Initiative

I call for an international summit to discuss the issue of dividing France into two countries for two nations, the French nation which will retain the name Republic of France and the other nation will be the Islamic Caliphate of France with Paris as its capital. If the French do not agree, then it will be illegal for a person of French origin to live in occupied Paris. They must withdraw from Paris and all parts of Eastern and southern France before November 2017. If not, they will be in violation of international law.

Does this sound familiar to you? We have been saying the same idea for years. Although this is supposed to be a joke based on the idea of the upcoming French initiative in which they said that if Israel does not accept their conditions, they will recognize a Palestinian State on Israeli territory. Now, any idiot will say, unless you are a French politician or a member of the radical far-left, if that is the case, the Palestinians will get everything they demand, despite having absolutely no rights, not legally, historical, moral or religious, so why should they negotiate? Because the French want to feel important! Forget the small issue that the French initiative is in TOTAL VIOLATION of international law of which they are signatories, not one of the multitude of Islamic countries, but the French. They want to feel important, on the backs of others.

But in essence, do the Arabs want another failed state? They have rejected overtures very often. Who will line their pockets if they get a state? How will the leaders get their billions? Look at the billionaires: Ismail Haniya, Khaled Mashal, Mahmood Abbas and Saeb Arekat. Look at how Yassir Arafat milked the coffers to become a billionaire.
I call for an international summit to discuss the issue of dividing France into two nations for two peoples, the French nation which will retain the name Republic of France and the Islamic Caliphate of France with Paris as its capital.

Let us continue with my satire:

The terror attacks in France have shown that it is time to make necessary changes in France. No longer can the French accept living in terror. No longer must they execute without trial, poor Muslims who simply want to murder people. Muslims are clearly waging war on France to transform the county into Dar Al Islam and it is time that France must start negotiations with them. The world now realizes that France cannot do it themselves, so we call on the  international summit. If they fail, we will divide France unilaterally as they did in the Middle East over a 100 years ago.

Isn't my attempt at humor similar to what is happening at the moment? As I have blogged before, Sharia Law divides the world into two domains Dar Al-Harb ( (territory of war or chaos) and Dar Al-Islam (territory of submission). Any place ruled by the laws of Islam even if the majority of the inhabitants are not Muslim is considered Dar Al Islam and no longer needs to be conquered.

Some people say that Israel should give the French a chance, should we trust the French? Well let us look at our history with France. During the first crusade (1096), a thousand years ago, the French placed Jews of Rouen in a Church and murdered them. Jews throughout France were at that time in great fear, and wrote to their brothers in the Rhine countries making known to them their terror and asking them to fast and pray. In the Rhineland thousands of Jews were killed by the crusaders. The French stole our property. Then there were expulsions, massacres, allowing us to return, expulsions, massacres, and a cycle. We stupidly did return. Who understands why? But hatred of Jews reigned for a thousand years in France. Dreyfus case anyone? That was only a 100 years ago. Holocaust? The French were willing partners. What about their actions against Israel since 1967? Will the French ever return all the money, land an other property they stole from us? Probably valued today as 1000 Trillion dollars. That would help my own bank account a bit. Jews have been living in France for more years than there was an Islamic presence in France, or even in Israel, should we also demand a part of France as a satellite of Israel?

So I ask again, why should we trust the French?

Saturday, May 7, 2016

I am NOT Islamophobic

I am NOT Islamophobic

Turkish President Erdogan wants to define Islamophobia as racism or a crime against humanity. He wants to put Islamophobia in the same category as anti-semitism. Interesting?

If you have a fear of open spaces or of being in crowded, public places like markets, you are agoraphobia. You will probably not go for a run in an open field, but that is your choice. You are not endangering anyone. If you are claustrophobic, you have a fear of closed space. Being in a lift scares you. Fair enough. You are not endangering anyone.
What is a phobia? A phobia is an irrational fear of something.
If you are homophobic, you have an irrational fear of gays. Unsure why you may have that, it is not as if they are going to attack you. Unless you are... On the other hand, there are many cases where gays are ganged upon and beaten. Sad but true. To be anti something is to be against it.

Anti-semitism is being against Jews. Anti-Semitism, hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious or racial group. This has manifested itself as pure hatred of Jews. Hitler tried to define Jews as a race. They are no more a race than Muslims are. Many Arabs today try to say that it it against them as well because they are also semitic. Simply total nonsense. In Europe today we see that Jews are scared to walk alone. There are attacks against Jews, against synagogues etc. The same thing is happening in campuses all over the United States. Jews are scared to wear anything to show that they are Jewish. To be anti-Semitic today is a trend. People say that they are not anti-Semitic but anti-Israel. That is the most stupid thing I have ever heard. Even the late Martin Luther King agreed.

We all know that to be anti-Semitic is to be a racist although Jews are not a race, they are a nation, a people. This is in total contrast with the so called Palestinians who are neither a nation, a people or a
race. Fair enough, you hate Jews because it is trendy, but what about Islamophobia? Should that be defined as racism? Is Islam a race? Not by any definition! Is Islam a nation? Tell the Turks that they are not a nation or the Iranians. 

What is Islamophobia? It is an irrational fear of Islam. That is what Turkish President Erdogan wants to define as a crime. Have you read the Koran? Have you seen what happens when God forbid you say something about Mohammed who was simply a prophet, a human being. If you do, you will no longer be around. Draw a cartoon about him, no! But to draw anti-Semitic cartoons is fine. Do anything against Islam and there are riots. Say anything against Islam and you will probably be beaten. But it is OK for them to say anything they want.  Try and tell them to shut up. If you do not bend to their ways, you will be beaten or worse, maybe loose your head. Are women safe? Heard about mass rapes in Europe? Sweden used to be free but now Stockholm is the rape capital of the world. Sad. Have you tried to walk through a Muslim neighborhood? What about during midday prayers? Scared? What about walking past or near a gathering of young Muslims? Do you feel safe?

Where do people come up with nonsense that Islam is the religion of peace? Where is there peace in Islam? OK, if you are a Muslim you will be at peace. Islam means surrender. Have they condemned their own terrorist attacks. Not all Muslims are terrorists, but almost ALL terrorists are Muslims. Ask yourselves why the wealthy countries in the Arabian Gulf have not taken in a single so-called Syrian Refugee?

What did Winston Churchill have to say about Islam, more than a century ago? Writing in "The River War", published in 1899, about the British retaking of Sudan, Churchill noted the threat of radical Islam:

Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die: but the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Islam, Churchill wrote, is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog.
In essence, nothing to do with the Arab Israel conflict!!!

Friends, I have read the Koran, a few times, I have seen how Muslims act and behave. I have seen their riots. I have watched the news, even left-wing news, opened my eyes.

 I really do not have an irrational fear of Muslims, I have a purely rational fear of them for me and you. We are not Islamophobic, we are realistic.

Sunday, September 6, 2015

Refugee crisis is the fault of Eurabia

The Refugee crisis is Eurabia's own fault

Hundreds of thousands of refugees lately fled Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and even Bosnia, to reach Europe, demanding to go to places like Germany and England. Many tourists are saddened to see their favorite spots overrun by tent cities, people without running water etc.

Why is this happening? The answer is simple. For years there has been genocide is Syria. Europe did nothing. Refugees from Syria poured into Jordan and Turkey. Europe did nothing. Almost a million dead in Syria. Europe did nothing. Over 3 million refugees in Jordan and Turkey. Europe did nothing. Did no one think that when these places were full, they would not try to go to Europe? If you had stopped these massacres years ago, there would be no crisis. A true crisis. Even Putin claimed that this was to be expected. Has he offered to take any refugees in?

Unfortunately Europe is so bothered with a fake invented crisis called the Palestinians because it can be blamed on Israel. Even as they trying to deal with a true humanitarian crisis, Eurabia is delving into rebooting the Israel Palestine talks. They do not understand that this is an invention, fueled by the Arabs.

Why is no Gulf state taking in these refugees? Because they do not want them. These refugees will change the face of Europe making it more Islamic than ever. Even intellectually challenged people like Emma Thompson says that Britain must take in refugees. She claimed that Britain is 'racist' for not taking in more refugees. Easy for her to say living in her home in Hollywood. A talbacker commented: "Muslims who live here are always putting down our culture, and hardly any speak out against the lunatics killing people here in the name of their religion. I think we're idiots to take more in, because when they get here they will try to turn our country into the one they wanted to leave." This is the same Emma Thompson who wanted to boycott Israel’s Habima Theater troupe in London accusing Habima of having “a shameful record of involvement with illegal Israeli settlements in Occupied Palestinian Territory". I believe that Thompson is Cambridge educated which says little about their acceptance level.

Even the head of the invented leader, Abbas, got on the bandwagon and is demanding that Israel allow Syrian refugees of Palestinian origin return to the West Bank. Forget the fact that most Palestinians from the Judea and Syria are of Syrian origin, so Syria is their true home. Forget that. Forget the fact that Palestinian nation was invented in 1968 and did not exist before that. Forget the fact that Abbas' legal tenure as President ended in January 2009 making him simply another dictator. Forget all that, remember only that in May 2015, Abbas refused to allow Syrian refugees into Judea and Samaria. He said, "it's better they die in Syria than give up their right of return" to Israel." Forget the fact that they have no right of return, it was not their land at any stage, But why is Abbas suddenly backtracking? Anything to do with his new $13 million palace paid for by European Union money which should have been used to help his people. Why does the world not call him out? Even our own opposition party leader, Hertzog, jumped on the same bandwagon.

Is this current crisis a new fight in the war against ISIS because in February, the Islamic State threatened to send half a million Muslim migrants in a ‘psychological’ attack against the West.
Is this current crisis a result of the newly inked agreement with Iran?

Israel is not protecting you, do you fell safe now?

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Iran is the new world superpower

Iran is the new world superpower

I have not spoken about the Iran deal because I thought that there were intelligent people out there who saw that this deal is ridiculous and does everything they say that it doesn't. Obama just came back from a vacation and apparently called everyone who thinks this is a bad deal, crazies!

OK, I am one of those crazies. Let me explain why I think this deal is bad in the simplest terms possible, bearing in mind that I am not a nuclear scientist.

  1. The Iranians are allowed to make their own inspections. Yes, you heard right. We should say that to all sportsmen as well. They must test themselves for performance enhancing drugs.
  2. If someone wants to inspect the nuclear sites, they have to give 24 days notice! Simply put, if the police suspect that there is a drug lab, they can phone you up and say we are coming to check whether you have a drug lab in your house in 24 days. How long do you think it will take to clear things out? Obama promised inspections to be not “anywhere, anytime”. Disappeared!
  3. The U.S. cannot demand inspections unilaterally. By requiring the majority of the 8-member Joint Commission, and assuming that China, Russia, and Iran will not cooperate, inspections would require the votes of all three European members of the P5+1 as well as the EU representative. Eurabia will do anything against Iran? They are scared of everything Muslim today.
  4. The Iranians are being given a $150 Billion signing deal. Do you know how much money that is? I would be happy if someone gave me $1 million. This money will only be used to fund international terror. Now, dear Mr Kerry tried to tell us that the Iranians cannot use that money for terror because of UN Resolutions. Hey no problem, give us the money and we will use it for other items and the money we now spend on health and education, we will use for terror instead. Kerry actually told Judy Woodruff of PBS News Hour, “There’s a UN resolution that specifically applies to them not being allowed to transfer to Hezbollah. They are specifically not allowed under another UN resolution to transfer to the Shia militia in Iraq." Strangely they still manage to do that!
  5. The deal is valid for ten years after that they can pursue their desires. Basically what Obama and Kerry are saying is that Iran can have the bomb, just not on their watch. Let it be someone else's problem.
  6. The deal provides for the West to provide Iran with Nuclear technology. Huh? The clause says that "E3/EU+3 parties, and possibly other states, as appropriate, are prepared to cooperate with Iran to establish a Nuclear Safety Center in Iran, engage in workshops and training events in Iran." So, the West will help them with the bomb.
  7. The US would help ensure the “physical security” of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure as part of the nuclear agreement. Kerry intimated at one point that this meant defending Iran against Israel. On NBC "Today" TV show, Kerry was asked if the Iran nuclear deal would make it likely that Israel will either physically strike Iran's nuclear facilities, or else launch a cyber attack against them. He answered "That'd be an enormous mistake, a huge mistake with grave consequences for Israel and for the region, and I don't think it's necessary." Ominous? Threatening?

I am sorry but there are more and more points against this deal.

Iran can have the bomb, just not while Obama is President. Let another president deal with a nuclear Iran.

Obama has brought the Doomsday Clock to near midnight, closer than we have been since Hiroshima. The most intellectually challenging contention made by supporters of the ignoble Iran “deal” is that its opponents offered no better alternative. So it is not that there was no alternative – it was merely that Obama was so eager to reach an agreement he was ready to accept almost any deal. He kept capitulating and compromising until the Iranians said yes. Basically it means that if you hold out long enough, you can get whatever you want. The Palestinians are experts at this.

"Our goal is to get Iran to recognize it needs to give up its nuclear program and abide by the UN resolutions that have been in place...the deal we’ll accept is: They end their nuclear program. It’s very straightforward."~Barack Hussein Obama, October 2012, presidential election debate.

Yeah right! In essence, with the new deal in place and all these secret agreements coming out, is there a place anymore for the IAEI?

Obama said that the whole world is for it. They rushed to push it through the Security Council. The
same people who sat negotiating with Iran met to authorize it. Unbelievable. Will this protect them in the long run? Strangely, the countries in the Middle East are against the deal. They feel that Iran is a bigger threat than Israel is.

Why did they rush in to make any deal that they possibly could without thinking? For China the reasons are probably business.  China sees Iran as a stable partner in the Middle East, allowing them to try and exert their influence in the Middle East. A recent report said that China and Iran have recently signed a  $1 billion deal that would see China trade 24 fourth-generation fighter jets in exchange for control of one of Iran's biggest oil fields. China needs this! As China has a huge chunk of the US deficit, maybe they demanded that Obama make any deal? Or maybe Kerry's Iranian son-in-law was threatened?   Or could it be that Kerry is simply capitulating to Iran because that is what he set out to do? In 2004 he told the Tehran Times that he will repair the damage to the relations with Iran.

Do you feel safer?


Thursday, June 18, 2015

Anti-Semitism is rampant and we are all victims

Anti-Semitism is rampant and we are all victims

Good day people, a few days ago there was a Facebook post from a British Muslim leader, Asghar Bukhari, claiming that while he was asleep, Zionists broke in and stole a shoe. A single shoe. This went viral. All over the news. By Zionists, we all know he meant Jews, not Israelis. Was he ridiculed, partially. But from chatter I hear on Facebook, some people believe him and have asked, why we stole his shoe.

Although he has been mocked, this does show shows how much British society has deteriorated, but also their tendency to blame everything on the Jews. Little wonder that Ed Milliband joined the band-wagon and took up the fake Palestinian cause.

But wait for a moment and think, if you are able to, if a white guy in America had said that a black American had stolen his shoe, what do you think would happen? He would be accused of racism across the board. But because he is accusing the Jews, it is OK. That is Antisemitism.

Now let us go a little further, what would happen if anyone in a Western nation accused a Muslim of stealing a shoe. Do you think you would be safe to go outside as a result of the riots? Wake up people.

If Israel is not around to protect you, will you still feel safe?