Is this 1938 again
Is it 1938 again? We have an element that is trying to take over the world, a new Third Reich, but this time Islamia. In the eyes of Islam, the world can be divided into two, Dar al-Islam or Dar as-Salam, meaning "the home of submission" in which Muslims have control, such as the Arab world and Dar al-Harb or "house of war" a country where Muslims are not in control. In essence, Muslims want to bring a new world order and bring every country under Islam or make it Dar as Salam. One Afghani said in a talk-back: "Islam wants to rule the world in order to make the earth a better place for living." Can you imagine that? Actually the word Islam has nothing to do with peace as some people claim, it is Submission. Did I say Third reich? Question is who is the Caliph? ISIS? Iran? Turkey? In Europe today Nazis are on the rise only this time, the Nazis wear rags on their heads instead of swastikas on their sleeves, and hate Christians as much as they hate Jews.A German judge recently said that "Anti-Zionism is the new code for Anti-Semitism." Obama, did you hear that? But there are more cases of items like this being dismissed. One blogger recently mentioned Charles Mauras from 1911, who said "Everything seems impossible, or frighteningly difficult, without the providential arrival of anti-Semitism, through which all things fall into place and are simplified".
Islam means "Submission" and has nothing to do with peace
For Jews, the world has become a dangerous place. Anti-Semitism abounds everywhere. Jews are not safe in Malmo or Marseilles, fully Muslim cities, and people say that Brussels is the next on the list. Is London safe for anyone anymore? In Paris, Jews are killed for being Jews or so the terrorists who shot them claimed, although the protector of Muslims claimed that they were "only a bunch of folks". It does seem that the US president is the protector of Islam, failing to denounce Islamic terror over and over again. I wonder where the American press is? What happened to them? Have they all been bought off?
Senator Barack Hussein was making plenty of noise in 2007 about pulling U.S. military troops out of Iraq. Obama based his presidential campaign on promising to pull out troops from Iraq and bring them home. Then President George Bush said at news conference on July 12, 2007, Bush declared: “I know some in Washington would like us to start leaving Iraq now. To begin withdrawing before our commanders tell us we’re ready would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region and for the United States. It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to al-Qaeda. It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale. It would mean we’d allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan. It would mean we’d be increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.” President Obama fulfilled his promise and ISIS (known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) or Islamic State filled the vacuum. ISIS is totally Obama's quagmire and of his own making. It is an an offshoot of al-Qaeda. If he had asked any Israeli, we could have told him that when you kill the head of the snake, it grows a new one. We assassinated the head of Hezbollah and got Nasrallah. But the murder of Osama bin Laden is Obama's ONLY success and even that is suspect.
Even if he had looked at recent history, he would see the mistake Prime Minister Barak of Israel (similar name) made when he unilaterally pulled out of Lebanon - we got Hezbollah attacks, over and over again. Hezbollah have created their own country in Lebanon.
Why even go so far as Barak pulling out of Lebanon, Prime Minister Sharon unilaterally pulled out of Gaza, giving the Arabs everything they wanted, including thriving businesses. What happened? Hamas took over and filled the void and we got rockets. Wait a minute, here's a thought. We left Lebanon and got Hezbollah. We left Gaza and got Hamas, both are Iran proxies. The same country that Obama says is so peaceful. He is begging Iran to be nice in the area, which they may do in the short run, but as we have learned from the so-called Palestinians, agreements mean nothing.
Can anyone explain to me why Obama is so short-tempered with Israel but when it comes to murderous regimes such as Iran, Turkey, Syria, Russia and Qatar, he is timid?
Why did Obama not do anything about Syria? How many people have been murdered there? Why nothing on Ukraine? OK, he is too weak to face Putin. Why nothing on Turkey who massacre Kurds? The Kurds are truly deserving of a country of their own, they are a nation. The tyrant of Turkey is his best buddy.
Now we have the question of why Obama is surrendering to Iran. Iran has learned that they can do whatever they want. Iran has learned that if they delay long enough, the West will retreat. Remember, it was Obama who did not want any sanctions against Iran. If he does get Iran to sign a bad treaty and that is what it looks like, then any problems that arise will arise after he has left office, so in essence not his problem. Any historian will tell you that appeasement does not work. Chamberlain tried it in 1938. Then there is another issue Secretary of State John Kerry has a son-in-law who is an Iranian-American with extensive family ties to Iran. Is it possible that the son-in-law's family has been threatened and Kerry has been compromised.
The world today is on the brink of annihilation by the new Muslim world order and President Obama as the defendant. Do you feel safe? Obama return the peace prize!
If Israel is not around to protect you, will you still feel safe?
