Thursday, May 14, 2015

Kill all the Jews, a new song


Kill all the Jews

I am one of those people who do not really think there is an opportunity for peace in the Middle East as long as there is Israel. If there was no Israel, then the Arabs would turn to killing themselves as they do in Syria.

A cousin of mine sent me this video to show my point. The video is extremely difficult to watch. I think it's important for all of us to fully understand the depth of the hatred that Arabs feel. I will not call them Palestinians because the Jews are the only Palestinians as anyone with an ounce of a brain knows. However this video shows how Arabs teach their children to hate, even through music.

According to the email, I received, "The Gaza Girls", a new so-called Palestinian girls band, is pleased to announce its new single, "Kill All the Jews.” The Gaza Girls hope to inspire Muslim women across the globe to express their individuality and say what they truly think!

The lead singer of Gaza Girls is Tina Shahida, an American convert to Islam who felt inspired to start this band after Israel supposedly committed genocide in Gaza in the summer of 2014. The way to win hearts and minds is through music!
Oh, by the way, if Israel committed genocide in Gaza, we are not very good at it. Nowhere near the level of Germany, Turkey, Nigeria, Syria, Iraq, Libya and many others.

Turn on your speakers. You will not believe what you hear.



SATIRE "Kill All the Jews" Gaza Girls Hit Single from Gaza Girls on Vimeo


This is not a satire. This is FOR REAL. Please forward to everyone, especially those you have ever argued with about the "poor Palestinians," or "land for peace."

If Israel is not around to protect you, will you still feel safe?

 

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Obama is having a tantrum


Obama is having a tantrum

Anyone think that the issue between President Obama and Prime Minister Netanyahu has anything to do with Bibi? The truth is, that there is no basis, as much as opposition leader Hertzog would like you to believe. Obama's hatred of Israel is ingrained and started from the word go. Check out this video from congress if you do not agree with me.



Remember also that Obama's father is a Muslim, his sister his a Muslim. His half-brother is active on the part of the Muslim brotherhood. He grew up with the hatred of Israel indoctrination.

Bibi recently said that there can be no Palestinian state until conditions improve and that angers Obama? Why would the Iranian leader chanting "Death to America" not be a concern for Obama while he is conducting a peace treaty or should I say, American's surrender to Iran. Strange that all of America's allies in the region, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan, are all worried about this surrender. In my previous blog, I mentioned why I thought the US is surrendering.



If you do not believe that what Bibi is saying is correct, just listen to this, from the serpent's
mouth:




So a longtime U.S. ally’s remarks on the viability of a two-state solution offends the White House as White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest claimed and as Obama said. But Iran’s “Death to America” remarks are fobbed off ? Oh, but the White House said the death chants were geared to a domestic Iranian audience so it’s not a big deal. Jen Paski could not explain it. She fumbled the issue.

Let me remind you of something very important. Remember that the area that is called occupied by many, is not occupied but disputed. Jordan occupied it for 19 years. That is fact. No Jew was allowed there. But the so-called green line was simply the cease fire line and not the border line. Written in all the ceasefire agreements. Furthermore, that being the case, when Israel took it back from the Jordanian occupiers, it became Israeli and not occupied territory. You cannot occupy your own territory. Geneva conventions are irrelevant here. If anything Jordan should be censured for occupying our territory. Forget all that. Remember simply that in the year 2000, Prime Minister Barak offered the terrorist Arafat, basically 90% of land that Arafat was not entitled to. Arafat refused and chose instead to attack Israel. This was called the Al-Aqsa Intifada. Then a few years later, Prime Minister Olmert, offered the Holocaust-denier Abu Mazen, 97% of the area and Jerusalem as the shared capital. Abbas rejected the notion. Forget the issue that Abbas' mandate expired in 2009 and now he is simply one of the many Arab dictators. Who exactly are we supposed to negotiate with? Forget the widely acknowledged fact, that were it not for the Israel Defense Forces and the Arab coordination with it, Hamas would already have wrested control from the corrupt Palestinians. Little wonder why Abbas is not stopping cooperation with what he calls the occupiers. Why should we negotiate? Is America going to return Texas to the Mexicans? Maybe that is Obama's next step?

Obama surrounds himself with Islamists, such as the placement of John Brennan as head of the CIA, a person who is reputed to have converted to Islam while working as a station chief in Saudi Arabia in the 1990s. No idea if that is true or not, but he refers to Jerusalem as Al-Quds. Strange. His best friend is Erdogan. He caters to Qatar.

He supposedly sends Jews to placate us and sent Martain Indyk, a former United States ambassador to Israel, as his Chief Middle East Negotiator. But Indyk's paycheck is from Qatar, a country who endorses world terror.

So Obama throws a tantrum because the only country in the world that listens to the Americans today, would not do exactly what he wants. Israel dared stand up to him and said stop treating us like dirt. So how does he react? He behaves like all the other rogue nations in the world and condemns Israel. How? By simply not defending a fellow democracy in a place where there is stupidity, such as the United Nations in which they again accused Israel for the 2014 war started by Hamas.

Oh, by the way, guess who is the number one violator of women’s rights in the world today? Israel. Violating the rights of Palestinian women. This was sent in by the Palestinian representative who wants to be a full member. March 20, 2015, only Israel, of the 193 UN member states was crucified for for violating women’s rights. Strange that at least a quarter of Israel's parliament are women. Strange that in Iran and Saudi Arabia, a women is condemned if she is raped. Strange that in other countries, they are sex slaves.

The world today is on the brink of annihilation by the new Muslim world order and President Obama as the defendant. Do you feel safe? Obama return the peace prize!

If Israel is not around to protect you, will you still feel safe?

Saturday, February 14, 2015

Is this 1938 again?


Is this 1938 again

Is it 1938 again? We have an element that is trying to take over the world,  a new Third Reich, but this time Islamia. In the eyes of Islam, the world can be divided into two, Dar al-Islam or  Dar as-Salam, meaning "the home of submission" in which Muslims have control, such as the Arab world and Dar al-Harb or "house of war" a country where Muslims are not in control. In essence, Muslims want to bring a new world order and bring every country under Islam or make it Dar as Salam. One Afghani said in a talk-back: "Islam wants to rule the world in order to make the earth a better place for living." Can you imagine that? Actually the word Islam has nothing to do with peace as some people claim, it is Submission. Did I say Third reich? Question is who is the Caliph? ISIS? Iran? Turkey? In Europe today Nazis are on the rise only this time, the Nazis wear rags on their heads instead of swastikas on their sleeves, and hate Christians as much as they hate Jews.

A German judge recently said that "Anti-Zionism is the new code for Anti-Semitism." Obama, did you hear that? But there are more cases of items like this being dismissed. One blogger recently mentioned Charles Mauras from 1911, who said "Everything seems impossible, or frighteningly difficult, without the providential arrival of anti-Semitism, through which all things fall into place and are simplified".

Islam means "Submission" and has nothing to do with peace

For Jews, the world has become a dangerous place. Anti-Semitism abounds everywhere. Jews are not safe in Malmo or Marseilles, fully Muslim cities, and people say that Brussels is the next on the list. Is London safe for anyone anymore? In Paris, Jews are killed for being Jews or so the terrorists who shot them claimed, although the protector of Muslims claimed that they were "only a bunch of folks". It does seem that the US president is the protector of Islam, failing to denounce Islamic terror over and over again. I wonder where the American press is? What happened to them? Have they all been bought off?

Senator Barack Hussein was making plenty of noise in 2007 about pulling U.S. military troops out of Iraq.  Obama based his presidential campaign on promising to pull out troops from Iraq and bring them home. Then President George Bush said at news conference on July 12, 2007, Bush declared: “I know some in Washington would like us to start leaving Iraq now. To begin withdrawing before our commanders tell us we’re ready would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region and for the United States. It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to al-Qaeda. It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale. It would mean we’d allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan. It would mean we’d be increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.” President Obama fulfilled his promise and ISIS (known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) or Islamic State filled the vacuum. ISIS is totally Obama's quagmire and of his own making. It is an an offshoot of al-Qaeda. If he had asked any Israeli, we could have told him that when you kill the head of the snake, it grows a new one. We assassinated the head of Hezbollah and got Nasrallah. But the murder of Osama bin Laden is Obama's ONLY success and even that is suspect.

Even if he had looked at recent history, he would see the mistake Prime Minister Barak of Israel (similar name) made when he unilaterally pulled out of Lebanon - we got Hezbollah attacks, over and over again. Hezbollah have created their own country in Lebanon.

Why even go so far as Barak pulling out of Lebanon, Prime Minister Sharon unilaterally pulled out of Gaza, giving the Arabs everything they wanted, including thriving businesses. What happened? Hamas took over and filled the void and we got rockets. Wait a minute, here's a thought. We left Lebanon and got Hezbollah. We left Gaza and got Hamas, both are Iran proxies. The same country that Obama says is so peaceful. He is begging Iran to be nice in the area, which they may do in the short run, but as we have learned from the so-called Palestinians, agreements mean nothing.

Can anyone explain to me why Obama is so short-tempered with Israel but when it comes to murderous regimes such as Iran, Turkey, Syria, Russia and Qatar, he is timid?


Why did Obama not do anything about Syria? How many people have been murdered there? Why nothing on Ukraine? OK, he is too weak to face Putin. Why nothing on Turkey who massacre Kurds? The Kurds are truly deserving of a country of their own, they are a nation. The tyrant of Turkey is his best buddy.

Now we have the question of why Obama is surrendering to Iran. Iran has learned that they can do whatever they want. Iran has learned that if they delay long enough, the West will retreat. Remember, it was Obama who did not want any sanctions against Iran. If he does get Iran to sign a bad treaty and that is what it looks like,  then any problems that arise will arise after he has left office, so in essence not his problem. Any historian will tell you that appeasement does not work. Chamberlain tried it in 1938. Then there is another issue Secretary of State John Kerry has a son-in-law who is an Iranian-American with extensive family ties to Iran. Is it possible that the son-in-law's family has been threatened and Kerry has been compromised.



The world today is on the brink of annihilation by the new Muslim world order and President Obama as the defendant. Do you feel safe? Obama return the peace prize!

If Israel is not around to protect you, will you still feel safe?

Monday, January 12, 2015

France faces terror


France faces terror

France has got a taste of what Israel has been facing, but only a taste. The world was riveted to see what and how things revolved. So world leaders got together and had a love-fest in the form of an anti-terror rally. Guess what? Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu was asked not to come. All this barely a month after France capitulated to terrorism and voted on the Security Council to create a new Arab country on Israeli territory.

So Bibi was told not to come, but he came anyway. So France told Mohammed Abbas to come. And he did. So at this very solemn arena, why is it that Abbas is smiling like a Chesire Cat?





France surrendered to terror and gave in to their demands as you saw in the UN. However terror is like a snake. It does not know what it is doing, so even though you surrender to it, like a snake, it will bite you anyway. France is lost.

France Told Bibi: If You Come, We'll Invite Abbas.

Abbas is introduced everywhere as the President of Palestine. Forget the fact that in 1948, Palestine became Israel. Forget the fact that Abbas has no mandate. He is a dictator. His mandate ran out in 2009. Forget that, all irrelevant. Issue is that despite going against international law, the French recognize this total farce.

The old France, like the old Sweden, no longer exists. You have surrendered to Islam already. People say that now is the time to wake up. It took Spain over 600 years to rid itself of Muslim terror and now they too surrendered to it. Can the world wait for Europe to wake up? To the French people, we the people of the world hereby declare that France should be partitioned into two states for two nations, both with Paris as their capital. From this point on, it is illegal to build in Paris or in any other part of the Islamic Caliphate of France.

If Israel is not around to protect you, will you still feel safe?

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Beheading is NOT a part of Islam


Beheading is not a part of Islam?


U.S. journalist James Foley was brutally be-headed in a video broadcast to the world. This was taped by ISIS or Dayish or Islamic State or whatever you want to call them. US President Barack Obama said the beheading of Foley was "an act of violence that shocks the conscience of the entire world". The President slammed ISIS, saying the militants speak for no religion, and that no faith teaches others to massacre innocents as ISIS does. Oh really, Mr Obama? Have you read the Koran? He gave the statement before he went off to play golf. Perhaps it is his job to play golf while the world burns? Reminds me of Roman Emperor Nero who played the fiddle while Rome burned.


Is this the first beheading of a journalist? How can we forget the murder of Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journal reporter who was executed in Pakistan in 2002. Both were working for American news outlets. Both were captured by so-called Islamist "extremists" and had video recordings of their executions released. In 2007, the Turkish despot, Erdogan claimed "The Term ‘Moderate Islam’ Is Ugly And Offensive; There Is No Moderate Islam; Islam Is Islam.” So in essence, Foley and Pearl were murdered by regular Muslims much like Erdogan himself is.

In 2013, two men attacked a man believed to be a British soldier in the London neighborhood of Woolwich. A video broadcast by the U.K. network ITV purports to show one of the two attackers explaining himself to a camera immediately after the attack. Here's what he said: "We swear by Almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you....You people will never be safe." Eyewitnesses described the attack as a "beheading." Have you forgotten?



We should not really talk about Britain that much as it has already been overrun by Islam. Remember this joke from 2009?

A Royal Navy destroyer finds four Muslims in a row boat in the Channel, rowing towards England. The captain gets on the loud haler and shouts, "Ahoy, small craft, where are you heading?"
One of the Muslims stands up and shouts, "We are invading the UK!"
The crew of the destroyer keel over laughing. When the captain finally recovers, he gets back on the loud haler and says, "Just the four of you?"
The Muslim stands up again and shouts,
"No, we're the last four ... the rest are already there!" 

Or this one:

Registry on the first day back at school in Birmingham, ENGLAND The teacher began calling out the names of the pupils:-
"Mustafa Al Eih Zeri?" "Here"
"Achmed El Kabul?" "Here"
"Fatima Al Hayek? " "Here"
"Ali Abdul Olmi?" "Here"
"Mohammed Bin Kadir?" "Here"
"Ali Son al En” - silence in the classroom. "Ali Son al En" - continued silence as everyone looked around the room. The teacher repeated the call.
A girl stood up and said, "Sorry teacher. I think that's me. It's pronounced Alison Allen." 
Particularly relevant as kids have just gone back to school after a vacation.

It is little wonder that Eurabia and England keep attacking Israel seeing as how they are so ridden with the same extremist religion that they drove out over a thousand years ago. Do not say we did not warn you.

But dear Obama, beheading is exactly Mulslim culture and consistent with the sacred teachings of Quran!

  • Book of Al-Maeda, verse 33 (5:33) -“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;” OK, no beheading here, but if you attack ISIS you will be executed. No wonder you are for Qatar, Iran, Hamas, Turkey, Muslim Brotherhood. I never could understand why a nation like Qatar with only a few hundred thousand people will need 11 billion dollars in military supplies. Maybe to arm the Muslim Brotherhood? But Israel is the root of it all!
  • Book of Al-Anfal, verse 12 ( 8:12) - “I (Allah) will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off.” A beheading! A beheading! Sounds like Monty Python a bit. 
  • Book of Muhammad, verse 4 (47:4) - “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), strike off their heads” Repetitous? 
  • Book of Al-Baqara, verse 193 (2:193) - “Fight them on until there is no more tumult and religion becomes that of Allah” 
  • Book of Al-Tawba verse 29 (9:29) - "Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the last day... and fight People of the Book, (Christian and Jews) who do not accept the religion of truth (Islam) until they pay tribute (Jizyah tax) by hand, being inferior.” Well, both of these show what they think of us. World domination! But, remember that Christians are also in danger. No wonder Penelope Cruz is siding with Muslim's against Israel, she is scared of losing her head. George Galloway is just an idiot!

But is this what Mohammed wanted? The prophet of Islam?

Hamas and ISIS are the same.
The Banu Qurayza were a Jewish tribe, living in northern Arabia until the 7th century, having arrived there after the Jewish-Roman wars that took place in the area of Judea, 600 years before the first Muslim. This is a part of the area which you say there was never a Jewish presence. The Muslim prophet, Muhammad, created 25-day siege of the Jews and they eventually surrendered. Between 400-900 males were beheaded! This was Muhammad's way.

“There is absolutely nothing in Islam that justifies cutting off a person’s head," Yvonne Haddad, a professor at the Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University claimed.  Perhaps this Georgetown University professor has not read the Koran. She was born in Syria and is a professor, but I do not think much of her knowledge or understanding.

Why behead? We are dealing with terrorism and the point of terrorism is terror. Historically terrorists hijacked airliners, performed car bombings, and suicide bombings. But beheading is now cool. Car bombings and suicide bombings have become cliche. They're so commonplace the media has stopped reporting on them in any detail. As for airliners, they've become very difficult to hijack so such deeds have become rare. Who cares if these tactics are tried on Jews. Hey, for a Jew to defend himself it is now called against human rights!

If Israel is not around to protect you, will you still feel safe?

Saturday, August 16, 2014

An investigation into Israeli war crimes!


An investigation of Israeli war crimes!

Another investigation into Israeli war crimes in Gaza by the UNHCR or United Nations Human Rights Commission. Their mandate calls to “investigate all violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, particularly in the occupied Gaza Strip, in the context of the military operations conducted since 13 June 2014.”

OK, the mandate is flawed from the word go. Why? Occupied Gaza Strip? I agree that Gaza is being occupied by a heinous group that goes by the name Hamas, but why not call it that. But wait a minute, why is there no mention of Hamas and their war crimes? Human shields anyone? Targeting civilians anyone? What occupied Palestinian Territory? Forget that Palestine became Israel in 1948. Since when was so-called east Jerusalem Arab? OK, you got me there, it was Arab for a whole 19 years! That is it! Even then it was controlled as occupied Israeli territory! 

Any idea which country drafted the resolution? Interestingly it was not drafted by a country or a nation or even a people, it was drafted by the so-called Palestinian delegation. The same people that are carrying out war crimes in Gaza. A kangaroo court indeed. It is like a murderer accusing the prosecution.

But let us look at the makeup of the committee of inquiry. It is to be headed by a Professor William Schabas. William Schabas, has claimed that he wants to see Netanyahu tried by the ICC. Why? Because of the Goldstone Report on Operation Cast Lead. Forget the issue that Netanyahu was in the opposition at the time. It is of little interest because when it concerns the Palestine issue, facts are irrelevant. In essence, in very recent years, he has already shown an anti-Israel bias. "The suggestion that I'm anti-Israel is absurd," William Schabas said Monday in an interview, pointing out that he's on the editorial board of the Israel Law Review. Hmm, so what. It is like saying, "some of my best friends are Jewish."

In early 2013 at a tribunal on the issue of Palestine, Schabas said in a statement: Anyone who says that Israel has the right to exist – is considered our enemies. This is the person chosen to head the investigation in Israel! Perhaps William Schabas should be on trial for racism, along with Pillay!

So a blatantly anti-Israel person has been chosen to head a mission to investigate Israel? I have the feeling that the report has already been written and the verdict decided and they just need to fill in the blanks? Should Israel cooperate with Schabas? Does it matter? Facts are unimportant with the UNHCR. If facts are provided, they will be ignored. There are none so blind as those who will not see. Or as Goebbells once said, "if you tell a lie often enough, people will believe it is the truth". This is in essence the entire basis of the Palestinian narrative, a nation that does not exist before 1964 and was invented by the PLO as a political tool. In their own words: "The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism."



If Schabas had an ounce of integrity, he would have recused himself as any human would, but this is for the UN. Schabas has said that he can remain impartial. Not sure that he can judging by what he has said in the past, complaining not only about Netanyahu but also saying Shimon Peres needs to be judged at the ICC. He has already judged Israel.

Can he look at facts and draw the right conclusion? Well, let us look at the facts from the past. In a 2009 blog post about the UN’s infamous extremely racist Durban II conference on racism, Schabas urged the world not only to “ignore” Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s statements, but to stop “exaggerating”  them. According to Schabas, those who “deserve the blame” are “Israel and its friends, who have manipulated the truth about the nature of the work of the United Nations by gross exaggeration of the role and intervention of certain fanatics.” Schabas described Ahmadinejad as nothing more than a “provocative politician,” and not a torturer of dissidents, inciter of genocidal anti-Semitism, and arch-sponsor of terrorism. Need I say more? Israel manipulates the truth in his own words. Again does it matter what we say anymore?

I truly wonder at which university Schabas is a professor because I have my doubts at his integrity and knowledge. I have found that he currently works as an international law professor at Middlesex University in England. I pity his students.  He has written multiple books on the issue of international law, does that make him an expert. I wrote a book on dating, so I am an expert. 

What could the UNHCR have done differently? Well apart from getting rid of pillay, they could have investigated Syria, Sudan, Iran, Russia, the USA, France and I can go on, but double standards abound. Does it matter that people are being beheaded by Muslims. Israel cannot be blamed. Is it not a human right to keep your own head? Does it matter that if you do not convert to Islam, you can be killed. Does it matter what NATO did in Yugoslavia? Or Turkey did to the Kurdish people? Or the Syrians? Not at all, because Israel cannot be blamed.

In essence, it is not important who was selected to head this investigation as it was already decided that Israel is guilty. 

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Israel is guilty of war crimes!


Israel is guilty of war crimes

"Israel is guilty of heinous war crimes in its belligerent war that it started against Hamas!" Someone actually said that on Facebook. I saw this while reading a post from a Facebook friend. The person who posted this, a fellow author, was once on my list of Facebook friends. I unfriended him because I found him to be a rabid anti-Semite and rather than go into debates with him about how ridiculous his statements were, I unfriended him.

In the latest comment I started by saying that first Israel did not start a war with Hamas. It never has. It never will. It is against our own humanity, but remember not against British, French, Turkish, Russian, American etc ideals. They do initiate wars. Belligerent? Do you know what the word belligerent even means? It means hostile and aggressive. When has Israel ever and I mean ever been hostile or aggressive? Any war has been defensive due to the belligerency of the other side and in the case of Operation Protective Edge, Hamas' continuous unprovoked attacks against Israel. Heinous war crimes? What war crimes? Who decides?

Marc Lamont Hill who claims to be an American academic, journalist, author, activist, and television personality and a distinguished Professor of African American Studies at Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia, said on CNN: "The Iron Dome is exclusively a defensive mechanism, but what the Iron Dome does is it also takes away all of Hamas's military leverage which is very different than say, 10 years ago or 15 years ago in other wars like Lebanon, et cetera. As a result, it not only serves a defensive purpose but de facto serves an offensive purpose. It allows Israel to essentially assault and siege Gaza without any retribution or response on the other side. So again, to some extent, they are not just funding defense, they are funding an offensive war and ultimately an occupation. That for me, is the problem."

First of all, it will not be the first time that an imbecile became a professor, but did he really spew such absolute nonsense? Forget about the fact that this is not an offensive war, or that it is not an occupation or that it is not a siege, facts are not important with people who cannot see. He is trying to say that because Israel built a system to defend itself from Hamas rockets, it is a crime? In essence that means that if you wear a bullet proof vest that you designed to stop bullets from killing you, you are guilty of a crime? Or if you build a bullet proof car or a tank to protect you, you are guilty of a crime? Perhaps the only war crime is that very few Jews were killed. The Israeli army is called the "Israel Defense Forces" because it is a defensive force. We build technology to protect ourselves, while others build technology to destroy us. Mr Hill, I suggest that you do not use a Firewall on your computer. Why? It is a defensive force designed to keep others out. It was created by Israeli technology to stop cyber attacks. Do not use it, it is an offensive mechanism. Mr Hill, do not use any anti-virus software on your computer. Same reason and also designed by Israelis to protect us.

Actually all of you who hate us Israelis so much must stop using Firewalls or anti-viruses. Why stop there? Don't use mobile phones, or Intel-based computers either. That goes also for my former Facebook friends.

I wonder where Emile Zola is?
Is the so-called professor alone in claiming that the Iron Dome is a problem? No. The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, claimed that Israel is guilty of war crimes because we did not share our Iron Dome with Hamas. She also accused the United States saying: "They have not only provided the heavy weaponry which is now being used by Israel in Gaza but they’ve also provided almost $1 billion in providing the Iron Domes to protect the Israels from rocket attacks. But no such protection has been provided to Gazans against the shelling.” Is she serious? Actually one blogger amusingly posted this today: "It is really unfortunate that, when they were being marched to the gas chambers, the Jewish victims of Nazi aggression did not contemplate the effect their deaths would have on the German death-camp guards. Certainly, they are guilty of not having found some way to protect the Nazis from the psychological consequences of being compelled to murder large numbers of human beings." Well, this Navi Pallay, who established the infamous 2008 Goldstone commission, in which every member of the commission announced Israel's guilt before the investigation. A typical case of who cares about facts.

Former US president Jimmy Carter accuses Israel of 'deliberate attacks on civilians' saying there was no humane or legal justification for the way the IDF are conducting this war.  Really Jimmy? We know your feelings about Israel. Nothing new. But why must people listen to what he has to say. It is like Israel listening to what former prime minster Ehud Olmert has to say. But Carter goes on to show what he means, "Three Israeli civilians have been killed by Palestinian rockets, while an overwhelming majority of the 1,600 Palestinians killed have been civilians, including more than 330 children. The need for international judicial proceedings to investigate and end these violations of international law should be taken very seriously." So now we understand the real issue. Three Israeli civilians were killed. No mention of the 64 soldiers http://mfa.gov.il/MFA/ForeignPolicy/Terrorism/Pages/IDF-soldiers-killed-in-Operation-Protective-Edge.aspx killed  in the war, which is fine in war, but when talking about Arabs, he says "an overwhelming majority of the 1,600 Palestinians killed have been civilians". According to more accurate reports, 1000 of that majority were Hamas terrorists. But I guess Carter's main issue is that not enough Jews were killed.

Does anyone care about facts? Not really. In this conflict, pictures were displayed showing children who were killed once in Syria and then again in Gaza. Propaganda? Or maybe like the infamous Mohammed al-Durra incident which was staged and no one knows today whether al-Durra was actually killed or not. The US is equally to blame. There was an attack on Hamas terrorists on Sunday which was NEAR a school. Jennifer Psaki said in a statement, "The United States is appalled by today's disgraceful shelling outside an UNRWA school in Rafah sheltering some 3,000 displaced persons, in which at least 10 more Palestinian civilians were tragically killed." Well, unlike the UN she said OUTSIDE. "The coordinates of the school, like all UN facilities in Gaza, have been repeatedly communicated to the Israel Defense Forces," State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said. "We once again stress that Israel must do more to meet its own standards and avoid civilian casualties." So, she is at last admitting that we have standards which are far higher than the entire world. The IDF confirmed it had fired on a target "in the vicinity" of the school. "The IDF targeted three PIJ (Islamic Jihad) terrorists on board a motorcycle in the vicinity of an UNRWA school in Rafiah," the IDF said. However Psaki said the presence of terrorists near the facility could not excuse the attack. However, evidence is emerging that the Israeli strike hit outside of the school and the bodies were moved into the courtyard to make it look like Israel hit the school.” Will Obama apologize to Israel? Will the UN? Don’t hold your breath. “Sunday’s Gaza School Attack Now Appears To Be Staged,” by Jeff Dunetz, Truth Revolt, August 4, 2014.

There is ample evidence to show that Hamas uses civilians as shields. IDF forces in the Gaza Strip found a Hamas manual on “Urban Warfare,” which belonged to the Shuja’iya Brigade of Hamas’ military wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades. The manual explains how the civilian population can be used against IDF forces and reveals that Hamas knows the IDF is committed to minimizing harm to civilians. As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, "We are using missile defense to protect our civilians, and they're using their civilians to protect their missiles." But this is not enough for the world at large.




You complain about the disproportionate destruction because of our Iron Dome defensive capabilities. Well, for the past 2000 years you have massacred us, whenever you felt the need for taking out your own aggressions. You passed laws against us, limiting our means of making a living. Forced us to convert or shoved us into a synagogue and burned us alive. Carried out pogroms against us. The Germans had true genocide and massacred six milliuon of us while you stood by, shaking your heads, not even letting us find shelter. Now we have our own country and when we are attacked in our almost 70 years, you do nothing to protect us. Well dear world, I hate to tell you, but we do not rely on you. If we are attacked by a bully, we may turn the other cheek for a while, but if we hit back, we will hit back hard. Very hard. We will make it so that you think twice before attacking us again. If you do not like that, then stop attacking us. Stop trying to kill us. I am sorry that I am not prepared to die simply because you hate us so much. Our only war crime and actually our only crime, is that not enough of us were killed.

Question, if there were more Jews killed than Arabs, would you shed a tear? To all my friends who hate us Jews so much, don't use Facebook to spread your hatred as that was developed by a Jew as well.

Oh and by the way, if Israel is destroyed, will you feel safer?